There was a time not that long ago when Madison Park could lay claim to a significant number of modest homes with airy yards and plenty of space between neighbors.
In the area to the north of East Madison Street, which was once primarily a working class-neighborhood, there remained unbroken blocks of one-story cottages. And in the area to the south of Madison, more than a few one-time beach bungalows still dotted the landscape.
While Madison Park continues to have quite a few modest-looking (though few modestly-priced) houses, the trend over the last 20 years — as in many other Seattle neighborhoods — has been to demolish the cottages to make room for the mega-houses.
An area of Madison Park near the Seattle Tennis Club was literally under water until 1916, when the building of the Lake Washington Ship Canal resulted in the lowering of Lake Washington by 9 feet. Until that time, much of my block was marshland.
Our house — constructed in 2001, sits on the site where a very modest home once was — built early in the 1900s as someone’s boathouse. Next door, there was (and still is) a tiny beach cabin built in 1914 for the president of the now-defunct Frederick & Nelson department store.
And the two little houses sitting on the other side of our property were former houseboats that had been pulled up onto the land when the lake went down. Each was no bigger than 800 square feet.
In the eight years we’ve lived here, almost all of the old houses on our block have either been torn down and replaced with larger structures or were significantly remodeled and expanded. The former houseboats are gone, replaced by narrow, multi-story structures that cover virtually the entire footprint of their lots.
Even the one-story, 4,000-square-foot, waterside mansion down the street, built in the 1920s, was recently replaced with an 8,000-square-foot, two-story structure, whose outbuilding of 3,000 square feet is larger than my house. And what’s been happening on my block is not atypical of what’s occurring in much of the rest of the Park.
The trend of short-platting Not everyone, to be sure, is happy about this trend. Local Realtor Val Ellis, for one, deplores what she sees as a potential threat to the character of the neighborhood. “I live, work and play in Madison Park,” she explained. “It’s my ‘hood, and I’m against anything that will spoil the enchantment of the place.”
While she doesn’t oppose people making improvements to their properties that are in line with the rest of the neighborhood, she does object to “obnoxious construction” that is inconsistent with the surrounding houses. She sees the crowding in and building up of the neighborhood as potentially undermining the flavor of the community.
Ellis and some of her neighbors recently found a catalyst for their concerns when the city notified them that two property owners in their area of the Park had requested approval to divide their lots into two. This is known as short-platting and, if approved, allows the development of each lot as a single-family residence.
The property receiving the most critical comment from neighbors is at 4202 E. Lynn St., at the corner of Lynn and 42nd Avenue East. There are currently two 1940s-vintage structures on the property, one of which appears to be a garage that was converted into a small residence. The other structure is a cottage that is separated into two living units. The lot has about 5,000 square feet, and subdivision will result in one lot of 2,557 square feet and another of 2,248 square feet.
The neighbors’ stated concern is that future development of the property will result in several large structures at the site, which could negatively impact the “flavor” of the neighborhood and potentially impair sightlines for cars at that intersection.
In spite of these objections, however, the city announced approval of the short plat last month. The Department of Planning and Development (DPD) decision took into consideration only the facts of the case and the requirements of the city’s code covering situations of this type. The neighbors’ objections were not material to the outcome.
According to DPD planner Holly Godard, the rule is that if there are multiple living units already on the parcel and these were permitted by the city at some point in the past, subdivision of the property is allowed. This assumes that other zoning requirements (with regard to such issues as setbacks) are complied with, she told me.
In this case, the structures had been legally approved in the past and the other requirements were satisfied, so the city has allowed the creation of two separate lots, each of which can support a new single-family residence. This necessarily will increase the value of the property for the owner.
A second property on the same block (at 2330 42nd Ave. E.) is currently under review for short-platting. The subdivision is likely to be approved, since the 4,800-square-foot property’s two existing early-1900s cottages were legally permitted. After division, there will be a 2,128-square-foot parcel and a 2,676-square-foot parcel, each of which could be developed as a new single-family home.
Godard points out that development of any property in Madison Park still must meet building-code requirements.
Nevertheless, grandfathering does allow more leeway for development of smaller parcels — and variances to code can sometimes be obtained when the rules need to be bent by the developer.
In the case of a needed variance, however, the neighbors will have another opportunity to weigh in and a much stronger likelihood of impacting the outcome.
Zoning Density in Madison Park is theoretically controlled though zoning. Most of the Park falls into the SF 5000 zone, which means that existing properties are meant for single-family residences and can be subdivided only so long as the resulting lots are not smaller than 5,000 square feet.
Washington Park is primarily in the SF 7200 zone, so properties there are expected to be 7,200 square feet at minimum. There are a significant number of grandfathered smaller properties scattered throughout Madison Park. And as we have seen, an exception to the subdivision rule occurs when there are already multiple legal structures on a particular property.
The subdividing of existing lots is not, however, the biggest threat to the character of Madison Park. There are probably few — if any — remaining properties that contain two legal residences that could be short-platted. The real issue has more to do with what replaces the cottages and bungalows once the demolition crew has done its job.
“It will be a crime if we can’t maintain the existing feeling of the neighborhood,” said Realtor Ellis. “Tasteful improvements are fine, but we don’t want those tacky townhouses here like you see in Ballard and elsewhere.”
With regard to the future development of the newly subdivided Lynn and 42nd Avenue property, she added, “It’s not over till it’s over.”
BRYAN TAGAS is a Madison Park resident and corporate banker who also writes the Madison Park blog (www.madisonparkblogger.com), from which this column was excerpted.[[In-content Ad]]
